ComputerHunter.org

 

The Dangers of Pesticides and the EPAs Harrowing Plan to Test Them on Kids


Pesticides are a ubiquitous toxin in our environment. We spray them liberally on ants and spiders in our homes, use them in our gardens and on our lawns, fog our streets with them to kill mosquitoes-even spread them on our own bodies to keep bugs away.

Farmers use 1.5 billion pounds of pesticides every year-and most have been found by the EPA to be carcinogenic.

But that's not all. American farmers use 1.5 billion pounds of pesticides each year-that's 1.5 billion pounds of pesticides sprayed onto the food that we, and our children, eat. And it's not just fruits and vegetables; meats contain pesticides too because the animals eat feed that has been heavily sprayed.

Plus, pesticides are used in many consumer products, including paints, cosmetics, food packaging, fabrics, carpets and exercise mats. And they're used extensively in parks and other recreational areas-golf courses are some of the biggest offenders; in one year they use seven or eight times the pesticides used on a comparable sized area of agricultural land.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has registered close to 900 pesticides, which are formulated into over 20,000 products, according to the Northwest Coalition for Alternatives to Pesticides.

Some 60 percent of herbicides, 90 percent of fungicides and 30 percent of insecticides are known to be carcinogenic, says the EPA, and these pesticides contaminate our groundwater, our air and the very food we eat.

What Are the Health Effects of All These Pesticides?

Animal and human studies on individual pesticides have shown that they contribute to an alarming number of health problems like:

* Cancer

* Fertility problems

* Brain tumors

* Childhood leukemia

* Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

* Birth defects

* Irritation to skin and eyes

* Hormone or endocrine system problems

* Nervous system damage

Children are especially at risk from the toxic effects of pesticides. Their bodies are still developing and immature, making them susceptible to such damage. In fact, studies by the National Academy of Sciences and the Environmental Working Group have found that children exposed to carcinogenic pesticides are at a high risk of future cancer and other studies determined that pesticide use was associated with an increased risk of childhood malignancies.

Knowing this information, think, then, just how outrageous it is that we shampoo our children with pesticides to kill head lice.

But all of these negative effects have been found largely from studies that typically focus on one individual pesticide. Who, then, is studying the cumulative effects on the body of all the various pesticides we're exposed to, and that we consume, over years?

The EPA's Testing Pesticides on Kids?

That kids are so vulnerable to pesticide exposure is precisely why the EPA chose them to study, and back in October 2004, they were given $2.1 million to do just that. Who were the granters of this large sum? The American Chemistry Council, a chemical industry front group with such big wigs as Monsanto, Exxon and Dow.

The two-year study-called the Children's Environmental Exposure Research Study (CHEERS)-would monitor infants in low-income families to determine how chemicals can be ingested, inhaled or absorbed by babies to children up to age 3, as well as the health effects they would cause.

Families in the EPA's CHEERS pesticide study would receive a t-shirt, video camcorder, bib, calendar, framed certificate, newsletter and $970.

Surprisingly, the EPA chose to name the entirely serious study a flippant "CHEERS." Study participants would receive $970, a t-shirt, a bib for their baby, a calendar, a newsletter, a framed certificate of appreciation and a video camcorder.

While the study does not require participants to change the level of pesticides in their home, nor does it expose them to any additional chemicals, it does require that they demonstrate a use of these toxic products in their home. Opponents are concerned that low-income families will up their pesticides use just to be involved in the study.

They also noted that since the study is partially industry-funded, it represents a conflict of interest. Most effects of pesticides are seen in the long-term, so it is unlikely that adverse effects will be seen during the short-term study. The result would be that the chemical industry could then claim an EPA study found their pesticides safe and push for looser regulations for their use.

Said EPA Pesticide Scientist Troy Pierce, "This does sound like it goes against everything we recommend at EPA concerning use of [pesticides] related to children. Paying families in Florida to have their homes routinely treated with pesticides is very sad when we at EPA know that [pesticide management] should always be used to protect children."

In November 2004 the study was postponed, largely because of the public controversy that arose around it, for a "final review" but is scheduled to resume in spring 2005.

It is certainly a step in the right direction that the EPA is taking strides to study the effects of pesticides that we're all exposed to. However, their proposed "compensation" for participating in this very serious study includes some gimmicky items: a free t-shirt, bib and calendar? And it even has a gimmicky name (CHEERS?), which may explain why the public was so alarmed when it appeared an industry-funded study was seeking to draw in low-income families to monitor their use of chemicals that the government already knows are toxic.

What's the Good News?

There is good news in all of this, and that is: It is possible to reduce your exposure to pesticides (though, admittedly, you probably can't reduce it to zero). The top ways to do this include:

*

Buy certified organic fruits, vegetables and meats (be sure to wash produce, particularly commercially grown produce, thoroughly before eating using a diluted soap solution)

*

Avoid the use of toxic pesticides in your home and yard (opt for natural pesticides that you can find in your local health food store instead)

*

Don't use pesticides for aesthetic purposes like dandelions in your lawn

* Don't use chemical bug repellants or lice shampoos

From the FREE SixWise.com e-newsletter, the Web's #1 most read newsletter with original articles in all 6 areas of life leading to complete wellness.







Google News - Top Stories

Analysis: 'Plumber' takes center stage at debate
USA Today - 46 minutes ago
By Susan Page, USA TODAY In the final presidential debate Wednesday night, John McCain and Barack Obama seemed to be vying for the affections not only of the average Joe generally, but of a particular Joe - Joe Wurzelbacher, a plumber from Holland, ...
A more-aggressive McCain deals no lethal blows in debate Los Angeles Times
McCain's Best Debate, But Obama Still Won ABC News
Dallas Morning News - New York Daily News - San Jose Mercury News - Washington Post Blogs
all 568 news articles


Boston Globe

Stocks plunge anew as data points to recession
The Associated Press - 5 hours ago
NEW YORK (AP) - Investors agonizing over a faltering economy sent the stock market plunging all over again Wednesday after a stream of disheartening data convinced Wall Street that a recession, if not already here, is inevitable.
Video: Stocks Fall 733 Points on Economic Woes AssociatedPress
Stocks plunge anew as data points to recession Orangeburg Times Democrat
CBS 2 - RGE Monitor - Newsday - The Associated Press
all 819 news articles


WELT ONLINE

Gov't to guarantee safety of Thais living in Cambodia
Xinhua - 48 minutes ago
PHNOM PENH, Oct. 15 (Xinhua) -- Sar Kheng, Deputy Prime Minister and Interior Minister, has asked to the provincial authorities to take care and guarantee the safety of Thai businesspeople and civilians living in the country, the Raksmey Kampuchea ...
Cambodia: Confrontation Over Disputed Temple Kills 2 New York Times
Deadly fighting erupts at Thai-Cambodian border International Herald Tribune
Reuters - BBC News - Bloomberg - Radio Australia
all 1,722 news articles


Washington Post

Verizon and AT&T Provided Cell Towers for McCain Ranch
Washington Post - 46 minutes ago
By James V. Grimaldi Early in 2007, just as her husband launched his presidential bid, Cindy McCain sought to resolve an old problem -- the lack of cellphone coverage on her remote 15-acre ranch near Sedona, Ariz.
Two Companies Put Up Cellular Towers at McCain Ranch New York Times
Cindy McCain asked and got cell phone coverage The Associated Press
CNN Political Ticker - The Washington Independent - Dslreports - Atlantic Online
all 125 news articles


CBC.ca

Phils reach first World Series since '93
MLB.com - 31 minutes ago
By Ken Mandel / MLB.com LOS ANGELES -- Using a perfect script without a surprise ending, the Phillies captured the National League pennant with a 5-1 win over the Dodgers on Wednesday at Dodger Stadium.
Philadelphia draws closer to title drink Philadelphia Inquirer
Phillies beat Dodgers, head to World Series Newsday
Denver Post - National Post - The Associated Press - Comcast SportsNet
all 824 news articles

Google
 

Copyright © 2006 Computer Hunter - A Division of Arthur´s Job Base