ComputerHunter.org |
|
|
|||
|
 |
The Professor Makes A Minus Power Move
If you think the power move has costs, consider the alternative. We are talking -- four friends -- bringing one another up to date on our personal and professional lives. David is department chair at the university; he is depressed. "Bummed out," he says. "I find myself withdrawing, caring less and less about the department, the school." We are stunned; just a month ago David was so enthusiastic about the possibilities he saw for creating a dynamic department. This is a man who deeply cares about relationships and family and here was his chance, as department chair, to create a caring professional community. He had just overseen a series of interviews with a promising candidate. "She is terrific, she has great energy, her research work is solid, and I think she impressed everyone she met." This was to be an important beginning, and David was charged up. "So what happened?" we ask. "The Dean," says David with considerable disgust. "The Dean said he'd support her appointment, but not with tenure. And without tenure we weren't going to get her. Without the Dean's support it just wasn't going to happen. So we lost her." We then drifted into a conversation about the Dean, his personal deficiencies, his weak leadership, his vision for the school (which was never anyone else's vision), and particularly about his aversion to diversity issues and women's studies, the rejected candidate's research areas. "He's a chauvinistic pig," says David, "all that feminist stuff makes him nervous." Then the conversation gets into speculation as to how much longer the dean will be around, what his employment prospects are. And so the hope for departmental salvation appears to lie in waiting for the Dean's retirement. At this point Max speaks up. "I can't believe this conversation. Your most powerful strategy is to sit here fantasizing about when the dean will leave. What about power? I looked at the listing of the nation's top one hundred schools, and yours was nowhere to be seen. What does that say about the Dean's leadership? And does that poor showing give you some leverage?" Max then looks at Dan. "The same thing happened to you. What was it, ten years ago? They screwed you on tenure, and you just walked away with your tail between your legs." Dan recalls a dream he had at the time. "I was leading a protest march; there was this army of students and faculty behind me." "Sure," says Max, "but that was your dream; in the wide-awake world you just walked away." Where is power? Dan has a thought about that question. "You know," he says to David, "You could have resigned the chairmanship, or at least threatened to. You could have said to the Dean, "I'm department chair, and it's my judgment that this candidate with tenure is just what the department needs. If you are not going to support my judgment on this, then I'm afraid I'll just have to resign." The conversation at this point becomess more electric. What might such a move have accomplished? Maybe nothing. "Sorry to see you go," says the Dean. But maybe it gets the Dean to think; it certainly makes clear the strength of David's commitment. And his resignation would cause some difficulties for the Dean. David is thoughtful. Dan's notion has much appeal, and it is frightening (a combination that inevitably accompanies the emergence of a power move.) "I would have been all alone on this; there would have been no faculty support, we are just too diffuse." "Maybe," says Max, "but maybe that's just the kind of leadership move that would have mobilized the faculty." David nods in agreement. Dan says, "And look at the costs of not making that move. You're depressed; all your enthusiasm for energizing the department is gone; the faculty remains diffused; and you lost a damn good candidate. Meanwhile the Dean comes away unscathed." David continues to be deep in thought. "You know what strikes me," he says, "the move never entered my mind. It's not like I thought about it and rejected it; I just never saw it." *** Limit Situations (Reference to Paolo Freire's Pedagogy of the Oppressed. I just never saw it. David's illumination gets to the heart of the limit situation. It is not some clear challenge that the actor faces and then chooses to take on or not. It is rather an option that is invisible to the actor. At the point of the limit situation, the actor sees no choice. The Dean's "No" is the end, in Vieira Pinto's words (cited by Freire), the "impassable barrier." It is "the given." It is only with a flash of insight, or a working through of one's depression, anger or anxiety, or, as in this case, through dialogue, that the invisible becomes visible, that one can "negate and overcome the given" (Freire's words), that "impassable boundaries where possibilities end" become "real boundaries where all possibilities begin." Strangely,the clues to opportunities for power lie in those moments when we are feeling angry, hopeless, and powerless. Barry Oshry
Google News - Top Stories
|
|
|
|
RELATED ARTICLES
Workplace Security Plan: Does Your Company Have One? Consultant's Perspective... Tap Employee Passion For Business Success Meriwether Lewis set the stage for the Corps of Discovery's success before one single "employee" had been hired. From the outset Lewis and Clark engendered a communications culture that brought in the right prospects, then kept morale high and increased the productivity of those eventually hired. Contract Management Software: the Solution to the Problem of Coordination Charles Petrie, from Stanford, released a short article entitled "The Problem of Coordination," which highlights 4 categories in which businesses find it difficult to connect: Influencing Change - A Guide for Sellers, Coaches, and Supervisors When people or groups make a decision to purchase something, they go through the same decision cycle that an individual goes through to decide upon a personal change, or an employee goes through to change behaviors at a boss's insistence. Tales from the Corporate Frontlines: The Organizational Structure of Our Growing Business This article relates to the organizational structure competency, commonly evaluated in employee satisfaction surveys. It shows how structural concerns can affect the typical employee workday, as well as feelings towards your organization's management hierarchy and reporting structure. A healthy organizational structure is one that arranges the activities of the enterprise in such a way that they contribute to the goals of the organization. Specifically, this competency looks to see if your employees clearly understand who they report to, as well as measure their sense of accountability to the organization. Evaluating this competency can be especially useful if your organization has recently experienced an organizational restructuring or might be considering one in the future. A Management Strategy I witnessed some interesting behaviour from one of our premier management schools this summer. A behaviour that I have since discovered is not uncommon. 13 Comments on Bad Meetings Bad meetings are a cultural malady that senior executives pass on to new employees. The High, High Price of Distrust A paper manufacturer with over 300 employees once announced that it was planning to move to more spacious and attractive premises thirty miles down the road. Tales from the Corporate Frontlines: A New Managers Tale This article relates to the Manager/Supervisor competency, commonly evaluated in employee satisfaction surveys. This competency evaluates an employee's feelings regarding their direct manager or supervisor. The manager/supervisor competency covers topics like clarity of goals, manager support, coaching and feedback, and regular reviews of performance. The old adage that "people leave their managers, not organizations" is often true. Of all the workplace stressors, a bad immediate manager is one of the worst and will directly impact the emotional health, productivity, and retention of an employee. This competency can be especially insightful if your organization is losing quality employees while your compensation and benefit packages are equivalent with industry standards. Your Company Without Training - Any Questions? Okay, be honest! Five Days to More Effective Inventory Management The litany of headaches related to the implementation and on-going care-and-feeding of enterprise-based inventory management applications (upgrading, downtime, maintenance, hardware obsolescence, and so on) is long. These implementation issues are enough make the savviest of companies want to engage in anything but another supply chain or inventory management software implementation. The Three-Dimensional Communication System Human communication is always three-dimensional. No spoken or written message is ever just words or rational thoughts. Every interchange between you and another person has and takes place at the following three intimately related levels, or dimensions, of being: emotional, physical, and rational. Any attempt to communicate will succeed if all of these dimensions are adhered to. Knowledge of this three-dimensional nature is the foundation of training. You can't get much closer to real understanding without these realizations. Delegating Responsibility Too many managers waste both time and energy performing tasks an employee could perform just as well, thereby lowering productivity while raising operating costs. The answer to the problem is easy-delegation. However, many managers still limit their own effectiveness, create imbalances in the organization, waste their department's time and energies, and fail to develop their subordinates by either ignoring or mismanaging the techniques of delegation. Implementation the Catalyst of Change for Management to Reach that Next Level of Success From the personal and professional experiences of other colleagues and myself, one of the more critical success factors for management is implementation. Through my observations, I have discovered that people and organization spend a great deal of resources including time, dollars and the cumulative total of the energy generated from these efforts to create business or strategic plans. Yet, these very same costly plans languish in a manager's desk drawer or on an executive's shelf. The incredible inspiration power within these plans lay untouched because few individuals understand how to implement the plan. Performance Evaluation: How To Create Change STEPS TOWARDS GIVING A GOOD APPRAISAL INTERVIEW: Give specific feedback. Statements such as, "You're doing a good job" and "You'd better shape up" are almost without value unless accompanied by specific feedback on what the employee is to continue doing or to stop doing. If you evaluate with the word "positive," describe how the employee manifests that characteristic. If you say that the employee "shows initiative," talk about specific occasions on which the employee did indeed take the initiative. If in your appraisal you must deal with other vague adjectives such as "cooperative," talk about instances in which the employee has worked well with others. Smart Staffing Practices: Don?t Confuse Activity with Results Does your hiring process consist of proven practices or just a hodgepodge of activities that get into gear when someone says, "I need more people" or "Sally has left and we need someone to take her place NOW?" How Your Business Can Pick A Software Developer Eventually, your business is going to need to have some software development. Your business is unique - you can't rely on a huge, faceless corporation to handle your unique needs with a shrinkwrapped, mass produced, production-line solution. You need custom software, and to get it, you'll need to pick an outside software developer. A hired gun. No Time to Focus on the Big Picture? Try Focus Management Here are seven Focus Management® best practices that you can begin using today: Experiences of Management Coaching (Part 2) In our experience, we have found that there are several reasons managers fail to get employees to see and acknowledge that they have a problem. Setting a Pitiful Example: Twenty-six Warnings to Heed * TO: All Parents [and Employers and Managers]
|
|
|
|
|
Comment by John S. Baick