ComputerHunter.org

 

Not All Protein is Created Equally


America's focus on nutritious eating began to receive national attention in the 1940s when President Roosevelt introduced the RDA, or Recommended Daily Allowance (RDA) model. This model, which took on the shape of a pyramid in the 1980s (and hence now goes by the term "food pyramid"), has gone through a number of iterations since its inception more than 60 years ago[i].

This change and evolution of the RDA model is, in many respects, a positive step. It demonstrates that, just as America's information on diet and nutrition is advancing, so too are the models that guide its eating habits. In fact, the USDA itself has decided to update the term and now refers to "RDI's" ("Reference Daily Intake") instead of RDA's.

However, undermining some of this positive change is the fact that many Americans are increasingly confused over what, how, and when to eat. A survey conducted by the USDA in 1996 verified this fact when 40% of respondents agreed strongly with the statement that "there are so many recommendations about healthy ways to eat, it's hard to know what to believe"[ii].

One of the most serious expressions of this growing dietary confusion has to do with a concept called the Daily Value, or "DV". Introduced by the USDA in the 1990s, the DV is a dietary numerical reference that is supposed to allow people to make healthy eating choices[iii].

The philosophical idea behind the DV, which is expressed as a percentage, is that it provides a very important piece of information. The DV informs consumers how much of a nutrient they are getting from a particular food item. For example, if the DV label on a can of beans declares that it represents "10% of the DV for fat", then consumers can keep track of that number to know if, throughout the day, how much fat they are eating[1].

However, one does not have to be a mathematician or a dietician to see that the above idea begs a significant question: is this10% of the DV for fat "good" or is it "bad"? In other words, should a consumer choose this source of fat because it represents a good source of fat, or avoid it for the opposite reason?

It is this question that has caused so much confusion among health-conscious consumers. It has caused particular anxiety among those who are wisely ensuring that they eat the recommended daily allowance for protein.

The importance of protein in diet cannot be understated. It is not simply an essential macronutrient for athletes, such as bodybuilders and runners. Protein is critical for life itself, regardless of mobility or athleticism. Among other essential functions, protein maintains and repairs muscle tissue, aids digestion, regulates chemicals, manages hormones, and produces enzymes[iv]. In extreme cases, a dangerous lack of protein actually leads to a condition called Kwashiorkor, where the body cannibalizes itself[2].

Trying to determine the right amount of protein ? as expressed in terms of DV% -- has been a difficult challenge for most eaters. Unfortunately, as a result of this confusion, some consumers have not been eating high quality protein. This is because the DV number is simply not enough information upon which they can make healthy protein eating decisions.

The missing number in the DV equation is the Reference Daily Intake (RDI) level. The RDI for protein is, generally, 50 grams per day. Consumers can take the number of total grams of protein in a product, and divide it by this RDI for protein to determine what the "optimum" DV number should be.

For example, if a product offers 25 grams of protein, and the RDI is 50 grams per day, then the product's "optimum" DV will be 50%. Therefore, the figure "50%" should appear on the product's labeling. If the number is lower than 50%, the consumers instantly know that it is not an optimum source of protein.

Finding high quality sources for essential micronutrients like protein (among others) is a challenge that should not be difficult, but it is, because some food makers do not want to educate consumers on how to detect high quality from low quality. This is particularly unfortunate in the health and nutrition food industry, where one would expect manufacturers strive for high quality nutrition. Regrettably, this is not always the case.

However, that is not reason to despair. Rather, it just as much reason to support companies that are making the effort to ensure that their products reflect only high quality DV levels, and a concurrent effort to educate the public on how to determine optimum DV.

About Protica

Founded in 2001, Protica, Inc. is a nutritional research firm with offices in Lafayette Hill and Conshohocken, Pennsylvania. Protica manufactures capsulized foods, including Profect, a compact, hypoallergenic, ready-to-drink protein beverage containing zero carbohydrates and zero fat. Information on Protica is available at www.protica.com. You can also learn about Profect at www.profect.com.

[1] The FDA is clear that the DV concept is not intended to direct people on how much they should eat. In this example, the eater should not conclude that eating 10 cans of beans will achieve "100% of the recommended fat intake per day". The DV is intended as a reference number only and not as a recommendation. The intake per day is suggested by the RDA/RDI, which will be discussed further in this article.

[2] Kwashiorkor is more prevalent in some parts of the developing world, but incidences have been reported in the US.

References

[i] Source: "Food Pyramid History". http://iml.jou.ufl.edu/projects/Fall02/Greene/history.htm

[ii] Source: America's Eating Habits: Changes and Consequences. USDA. http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/aib750/

[iii] Source "Daily Values Encourage Healthy Eating". FDA. http://www.fda.gov/fdac/special/foodlabel/dvs.html

[iv] Source: "The Importance of Protein". OhioHealth. http://www.ohiohealth.com/facilities/mcconnell/weightmanage/details/protein.htm

Copyright 2004 - Protica Research - http://www.protica.com







Google News - Top Stories

BBC News

Europe banks extend rally on state aid, US plan
guardian.co.uk - 1 hour ago
LONDON, Oct 14 (Reuters) - European bank shares rallied for a second day on Tuesday after a host of European countries pledged to support ailing lenders and US authorities looked set to follow suit, helping fuel a Wall Street surge.
Europe Factors--Shares set to extend rally on US plan Forbes
Stocks Soar 11 Percent on Aid to Banks New York Times
BBC News - The Desert Sun - San Francisco Chronicle - Chicago Tribune
all 1,228 news articles


Boston Globe

Consistent message eluding McCain
Boston Globe - 2 hours ago
John McCain and his running mate, Sarah Palin, campaigned in Virginia yesterday. The two are trying to keep the fervor of conservatives while reaching independent voters.
Race Remains Campaign Issue, but Not a Clear One New York Times
Sarah Palin to rock Granite State Boston Herald
Washington Post - Chicago Tribune - The Associated Press - FOXNews
all 1,805 news articles


Sydney Morning Herald

Wind-Fueled Wildfires Threaten LA Suburbs
Washington Post - 2 hours ago
LOS ANGELES -- Two wildfires driven by strong Santa Ana winds threatened neighborhoods near Los Angeles on Monday, forcing frantic evacuations on smoke- and traffic-choked highways, burning dozens of mobile homes and causing at least two deaths.
Video: Mayor: Thank God for Our Firefighters AssociatedPress
Deadly wind-driven fires threaten homes The Desert Sun
Reuters - Whittier Daily News - KSBW - International Herald Tribune
all 3,820 news articles


Thanh Nien Daily

Thailand to act in self-defense
Xinhua - 31 minutes ago
BANGKOK, Oct. 14 (Xinhua) -- Thailand's Foreign Ministry Spokesman Tharit Charungvat said Tuesday that If Cambodia resorts to use of force, Thailand will have to exercise its right of self-defense as provided under the Charter of the United Nations ...
Thailand denies withdrawal from disputed Cambodian border AFP
Cambodia: Thai troops retreat from disputed border The Associated Press
Reuters AlertNet - International Herald Tribune - Jerusalem Post - Radio Australia
all 598 news articles


Reuters

Smith says 42-day detention plan not dead
Reuters UK - 32 minutes ago
By Michael Holden LONDON (Reuters) - The government will rush through emergency legislation to allow police to hold terrorism suspects for 42 days without charge in the event of a serious threat or an attack, Home Secretary Jacqui Smith said on Tuesday ...
Jacqui Smith defends emergency plan for 42 days detention Telegraph.co.uk
Falconer leads assault on 42-day plan guardian.co.uk
Sky News - Belfast Telegraph - BBC News - Deutsche Welle
all 755 news articles

Google
 

Copyright © 2006 Computer Hunter - A Division of Arthur´s Job Base